Sometimes it's difficult to function, and that's what friends and family are for - I know I will always be able to rely on my family and friends to care for my birds in the event that I am struggling to function.
So to me, even if your symptoms are severe, you can still have pets, you can even have children. You just have to surround yourself with a support structure. ]
You speak of family and friends, which is nice for people who have that in their life, but not everyone has a supportive, tight knit family or good, reliable social circle. Many families of mentally ill people (some of the family members showing symptoms of mental illness themselves) do not believe mental illness exists, much less be supportive of a parent, spouse/partner, child or relative with one. A lot of mentally ill people have absolutely no one, some may not even have a stable place to live. If they have severe mental illness, especially the kinds where they are not fully engaged with reality (such as unmanaged schizophrenia, dissociative identity disorder) or those with borderline personality disorder, those who frequently fall into dissociative states or even those who are self-medicating with drugs and/or alcohol, they probably shouldn't be the primary caretake of themselves much less other sentient beings until their illnesses are being managed and/or addictions treated.
You also forget about those individuals with more dangerous forms of mental illness. Have you ever dealt with a true narcissist? They use and abuse with no ability to empathize with those they bring harm to. They don't care what they do so long as it benefits them. It's not me being mean saying these things either, it's actually recognized symptoms of the disorder:
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/narcissistic-personality-disorder/. What about someone with true antisocial personality disorder, some of whom can be violent and also do not possess the ability to empathize? Should people with those issues really own an animal (or have children, for that matter)? They may not be able to help the disorders they have, but due to their illnesses, the harm they can bring to other living beings is too great to justify them being in charge of care of another being.
Also, in the past, my anxiety was much much worse as was my depression. I don't discuss publicly what started it or just how bad it got, but I assure you, I do understand.
As a preface, I would like to state that I am very knowledgeable on this topic. I am not only studying to become a psychologist, but I have an entire blog dedicated to mental disorders and breaking the stigma surrounding them. I would like to mention that I have dissociative episodes, so I actually have personal experience with that.
I have also interacted with many mentally ill people. I dated someone with Borderline Personality Disorder, I have a friend who has severe Schizophrenia, one of my best friends has Bipolar Type 1 and Anorexia. I've also met multiple different people in mental hospitals (where I was admitted), including people with Histrionic Personality Disorder, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Autism and a few others, as well as people with horrible drug addictions.
I mean hell, I even own a copy of the DSM-V, which I regularly refer to when I write, and I'm not even a psychologist yet. So I know a lot about mental health, not only through my own reading and research but because I have had hands on experience.
As I said, this is literally my life's purpose, I am always trying to help those with mental disorders, educate others and to bring to light many of the stigmas surrounding mental disorders.
My point is that, under the right circumstances (such as my own), it is alright for someone with a mental disorder to have pets as a primary caregiver. If someone doesn't live within this circumstance, or is undiagnosed, or is a danger to others (such as ASPD) - YES, they probably shouldn't have pets. But to broadly say that anyone with a severe mental disorder shouldn't have pets just isn't right - because it is entirely dependent on individual circumstances. I am medicated and stable, but I still have two severe mental disorders that have greatly impaired my life.
I have neither forgotten about or disregarded the circumstances or disorders that you mentioned. I had assumed that your argument was made on the basis that those who have severe enough illnesses (for example, to be hospitalised or unable to function) should just never have any pets. Of course, as I said, people who have no one to support them, or are a danger to living things, probably shouldn't have pets. But that wasn't what I was arguing against initially.
What I was saying is that it is 100% possible for someone with a "severe" mental illness to care for pets, when the right circumstances are in place. You brought up some circumstances were it wouldn't be advisable, such as those with Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Anti-social Personality Disorder, or those who lack any support. I agree with this, but you initially didn't specify which disorders you were referring to, only mentioning "severe" mental disorders.
Severity in and of itself does not automatically imply incapability.
In my mind, "severe" symptoms such as dissociative episodes, panic attacks, manic episodes or depressive episodes does not automatically make a person any less able to care for an animal under the right circumstances. Yes, it helps to have support structures and stability - and as someone who has been to hell and back, I feel strong, capable and responsible despite my struggles, and there are so many individuals like me out there. Often mentally ill people feel like they are incapable, and it's a terrible feeling. Hence why I try to uplift and inspire as many people as possible.
I would also briefly like to mention that a majority of mental illnesses do not have any outwardly violent thought patterns or symptoms. The only few are in the personality disorder group, which you mentioned. People with Schizophrenia and Bipolar (for example). aren't inherently violent or irresponsible.
Initially, I felt that it was a generalisation, hence why I made my post to give a counter argument. I do appreciate that you specified further on what you were arguing in terms of specific disorders. My point is that "severity" in and of itself does not automatically mean that someone shouldn't have pets - It depends on diagnosis, treatment, support structures - it is multifactorial.
This is the gist of my argument:
1) Severity does not make someone incapable;
2) Severity does not imply "violent"
3) Severity doe not imply "irresponsible"
4) Broad statements shouldn't be made. Rather specify first so as to avoid confusion or misunderstanding.
Anyway, this discussion is making me a bit stressed. I hope I haven't offended anyone. Also, sorry if it’s a bit repetitive or long, I’ve had a long day so I was just typing like a stream of thought.