noodles123
Well-known member
- Jul 11, 2018
- 8,145
- 478
- Parrots
- Umbrella Cockatoo- 15? years old..I think?
Be careful...but congrats on the haircut! I kind of get a kick out of seeing everyone run around "unkempt" lol.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our state started opening already but me and my family decided to wait a little further since we think it is still a bit too early.
Each individual has the right to choose when and to what level of protection they elect to use when reentering social activity. I'm certain that no one is or will force you to stray-out of your home...
As each State opens back-up it is done based on that State's choice against guidelines provided by CDC.
Enjoy the Freedom provided by America's Bill of Rights.
This kicks off a different debate! When someone is deliberately using a situation to create a false panic, and then using it to prove they are doing it for the better good, I have a problem!Our state started opening already but me and my family decided to wait a little further since we think it is still a bit too early.
Each individual has the right to choose when and to what level of protection they elect to use when reentering social activity. I'm certain that no one is or will force you to stray-out of your home...
As each State opens back-up it is done based on that State's choice against guidelines provided by CDC.
Enjoy the Freedom provided by America's Bill of Rights.
Don't hate me for saying this, okay? I am very passionate about this concept though and...so....
I assert that this statement about "rights" could be disputed based on our own laws...
When one's actions kill or risk the lives of others, it is no longer a matter of personal freedom, but an imposition on the rights of others' access to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" (if there is a lot of crime in an area, people choose to stay in at night, but does that mean that they should be forced to make that choice due to the negligence of others? Does that mean that the crime itself is an acceptable choice in such areas, even when it negates the rights of those who would "choose" to go outside in its absence?)
Viruses have no borders...and a choice made in rural Montana could impact the entire world, because we are all so connected.
If I choose to spread a deadly virus to someone else (or fail to disclose that I may have it) that is criminal <---quite literally (there are court cases that set that precedent well before covid).
We all know that plenty of people can carry this without symptoms and that, before the lock-down, the R0 was quite high. It takes one careless (heck, AVERAGE) person to infect a bevy of innocent bystanders, who then go on to do the same thing- not knowing they themselves are now transmitting the virus as well.
Until we have a better handle on this, I think face-coverings should NOT be optional in public settings (as they protect those around you-- not the wearer)...Just as gloves are not optional in an operating room, and headlights are required when driving at night...and drinking and driving is illegal when it poses a threat to others on the road. Personal freedoms have a limit when they impact others and could create an even larger economic melt-down in the future. It's like playing a world-wide game of "Russian Roulette" when people avoid precautions out of the perceived "inconvenience" of it all.
It's not about the individual-- it's about the impact that individual could unknowing have on thousands of families and the economy, all because an individual doesn't feel like taking precautions.
I am generally pretty laissez faire when it comes to things--as long as it is not hurting others and as long as it is not going to turn around an hurt the economy-- but that isn't the case here..I am not a democrat and I am not a republican-- but this impacts too many people who will inadvertently harm others (and eventually, indirectly, themselves).
This kicks off a different debate! When someone is deliberately using a situation to create a false panic, and then using it to prove they are doing it for the better good, I have a problem!Each individual has the right to choose when and to what level of protection they elect to use when reentering social activity. I'm certain that no one is or will force you to stray-out of your home...
As each State opens back-up it is done based on that State's choice against guidelines provided by CDC.
Enjoy the Freedom provided by America's Bill of Rights.
Don't hate me for saying this, okay? I am very passionate about this concept though and...so....
I assert that this statement about "rights" could be disputed based on our own laws...
When one's actions kill or risk the lives of others, it is no longer a matter of personal freedom, but an imposition on the rights of others' access to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" (if there is a lot of crime in an area, people choose to stay in at night, but does that mean that they should be forced to make that choice due to the negligence of others? Does that mean that the crime itself is an acceptable choice in such areas, even when it negates the rights of those who would "choose" to go outside in its absence?)
Viruses have no borders...and a choice made in rural Montana could impact the entire world, because we are all so connected.
If I choose to spread a deadly virus to someone else (or fail to disclose that I may have it) that is criminal <---quite literally (there are court cases that set that precedent well before covid).
We all know that plenty of people can carry this without symptoms and that, before the lock-down, the R0 was quite high. It takes one careless (heck, AVERAGE) person to infect a bevy of innocent bystanders, who then go on to do the same thing- not knowing they themselves are now transmitting the virus as well.
Until we have a better handle on this, I think face-coverings should NOT be optional in public settings (as they protect those around you-- not the wearer)...Just as gloves are not optional in an operating room, and headlights are required when driving at night...and drinking and driving is illegal when it poses a threat to others on the road. Personal freedoms have a limit when they impact others and could create an even larger economic melt-down in the future. It's like playing a world-wide game of "Russian Roulette" when people avoid precautions out of the perceived "inconvenience" of it all.
It's not about the individual-- it's about the impact that individual could unknowing have on thousands of families and the economy, all because an individual doesn't feel like taking precautions.
I am generally pretty laissez faire when it comes to things--as long as it is not hurting others and as long as it is not going to turn around an hurt the economy-- but that isn't the case here..I am not a democrat and I am not a republican-- but this impacts too many people who will inadvertently harm others (and eventually, indirectly, themselves).
If one is not being hurt financially by the virus, I choose to pay little attention to that person's position on opening up the country.
I'm not at all financially affected by the virus, in fact at this time I would normally be spending money and playing at my very expensive summer sport while instead I'm teleworking and making money that I normally don't this time of year. In my job I get paid partly because of my ability to understand and be empathetic to both sides of a disagreement. My sense is that many people who are vocal about keeping things closed have little empathy for those people who may be going hungry, loosing their home, and maybe loosing everything they have. For those not having an income or on a greatly reduced income the risk/reward decision is an easy one.
If a person is worried about infection, they can stay in the home that they continue to be able to pay the mortgage/rent on and reduce their risk. I really doubt that there are many people who are in dire straits that aren't eager to get back to work.
Yesterday CT opened up partially..the last state,except for NYC. 20 deaths reported yesterday...over 3500 died. Hospitals have released a lot of people but and there is a decline in admissions. next week David has to go in for "surgery" on his back...actually its just some sort of injection. This morning he had to go and get tested before they will see him. I see more traffic,some resturants who have the space have set up tents in their parking lots. Davids favorite place has a small lot and no room for social distancing. This sucks.
Jim
Remember, Facebook is openly censoring posts to promote it’s agenda! Google is also!wow, information is so important at this time. Speaking for my family, we are all in our
own local town/village facebook groups. The local NHS hospitals/police are keeping us upto date with numbers/issues, local businesses (whom we are all trying to support) are keeping us upto date with home deliveries etc, etc. I think a lot of people in the UK simply dont follow national news as its all sensationalising every thing and not picking the information that is important any more. So again, local communities use facebook to keep us all informed of local news. Its giving the bonus of letting local issues be known and people can help. Its given a real strong British sense of 'togetherness' and certainly for my town/village its working to keep us safe.
forget national press, talk together and look out for your own community at this point in time
Yesterday CT opened up partially..the last state,except for NYC. 20 deaths reported yesterday...over 3500 died. Hospitals have released a lot of people but and there is a decline in admissions. next week David has to go in for "surgery" on his back...actually its just some sort of injection. This morning he had to go and get tested before they will see him. I see more traffic,some resturants who have the space have set up tents in their parking lots. Davids favorite place has a small lot and no room for social distancing. This sucks.
Jim
Could you set up a picnic in the park with a fold-able table and chairs-- pack plates etc and then get curbside?
I know, dont mention the chinese for sure, ive had several warnings! So be smart and word things to avoid the robotsRemember, Facebook is openly censoring posts to promote it’s agenda! Google is also!
Yesterday CT opened up partially..the last state,except for NYC. 20 deaths reported yesterday...over 3500 died. Hospitals have released a lot of people but and there is a decline in admissions. next week David has to go in for "surgery" on his back...actually its just some sort of injection. This morning he had to go and get tested before they will see him. I see more traffic,some resturants who have the space have set up tents in their parking lots. Davids favorite place has a small lot and no room for social distancing. This sucks.
Jim
Could you set up a picnic in the park with a fold-able table and chairs-- pack plates etc and then get curbside?
Lunch after a lumbar injection really should be in a quality chair as proper position after the injection helps to assure that it's successful! Early failure, now that really sucks!